Skip to main content
🔵 Concept
IoT & Infrastructure Updated November 12, 2025

IoT MCP Hub

Turn your smart home devices into MCPs for seamless data sharing and local AI

Feasibility:
Excitement:
Seriousness:

The Problem

IoT devices create data silos forcing you to juggle multiple apps for weight, food, heart rate, and more. There's no unified way to let these devices communicate or leverage your local compute power for AI insights.

The Story Behind This App

IoT MCP Hub

The inspiration for this came from the frustration of managing a smart home where every device demands its own app, and none of them talk to each other. You track weight on one app, log food in another, monitor heart rate in a third - all generating valuable data that stays trapped in silos.

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) provides the perfect foundation to solve this. What if every IoT device in your home could expose an MCP interface? Your smart scale becomes an MCP server. Your fitness tracker becomes an MCP server. Your smart fridge becomes an MCP server.

The Vision

Instead of apps owning your devices, devices become first-class data sources that any authorized application can subscribe to. Your nutrition app doesn’t need to own your scale - it just subscribes to weight measurements via MCP. Your health dashboard correlates heart rate, sleep, and activity without needing accounts across five different ecosystems.

Local AI Revolution

The real magic happens when you combine this with local compute. A Blackwell GPU or even a modest NVIDIA card sitting idle in your home can run surprisingly capable LLMs via your LAN. No data leaves your house, yet you get AI insights that correlate patterns across all your devices:

  • “Your weight fluctuates on weekends when your smart fridge shows more snack access and your fitness tracker shows less activity”
  • “Your heart rate variability improves on nights when your thermostat maintained 68°F vs 72°F”
  • “Your productivity (tracked via keyboard/mouse activity) peaks 2 hours after your smart coffee maker brews”

Decentralized Computing

Why should AI only run in datacenters? Your home network likely has multiple devices with compute power:

  • Gaming PC with GPU (idle most of the day)
  • NAS with CPU cores to spare
  • Smart TV with processing capabilities
  • Even modern routers have meaningful compute

IoT MCP Hub orchestrates this distributed compute pool, scheduling AI workloads during idle times and optimizing for energy costs. Run your LLM inference when solar panels are generating excess power. Train personal models overnight when electricity is cheap.

Privacy First

Everything stays local by default. The hub runs on your LAN. Data doesn’t touch the cloud unless you explicitly configure backup. When you grant an app access to device data, it’s temporary, revocable, and auditable. You see exactly which app accessed which sensor at what time.

Technical Challenges

Making this work requires solving some hard problems:

  • Most IoT devices aren’t designed to be MCP servers - need adapter layer
  • Device discovery and automatic MCP endpoint registration
  • Security model for app authorization without becoming a UX nightmare
  • Handling spotty IoT connectivity and offline operation
  • Managing compute workload distribution across heterogeneous hardware

But the potential payoff is huge: true smart home intelligence without sacrificing privacy or control.

Key Features

1. Device-as-MCP Protocol

What: Each IoT device exposes an MCP interface for standardized communication

Why: Universal protocol eliminates app-switching and enables cross-device automation

2. Local Data Hub

What: Central hub on your LAN aggregates all device data with zero cloud dependency

Why: Complete privacy control with sub-second latency for real-time insights

3. Distributed Compute Pool

What: Harness idle GPUs and compute across your home network

Why: Run local LLMs on Blackwell/NVIDIA hardware without sending data externally

4. Smart Context Engine

What: AI correlates weight scale + food log + heart rate automatically

Why: Eliminates manual data entry and reveals patterns across health metrics

5. App-Specific Data Streams

What: Applications subscribe only to data they need via MCP channels

Why: Privacy-preserving selective sharing without full device access

User Journey

  1. 1 User sets up IoT MCP Hub on local network (Raspberry Pi, NUC, or homelab)
  2. 2 Devices auto-discover and register as MCP endpoints
  3. 3 User authorizes which apps can access which data streams
  4. 4 Morning: Step on scale, weight auto-syncs to fitness apps
  5. 5 AI running on local GPU analyzes trends across all health data
  6. 6 Receives personalized insights without data leaving home network

Technical Architecture

Frontend

Tauri desktop app + Progressive Web App for mobile access

Backend

Rust-based MCP server with MQTT/CoAP for IoT protocols

Data

TimescaleDB for time-series + Redis for real-time streams

APIs

  • MCP protocol for device communication
  • WebSocket for real-time app connections
  • Matter/Thread for smart home devices
  • ONNX Runtime for local AI inference
  • ollama/llama.cpp for LLM integration

Hosting

Self-hosted on LAN with optional encrypted cloud backup

Moonshot Features (v2.0)

  • Blockchain-based audit logs for data access transparency
  • Federated learning across neighborhood devices (privacy-preserving)
  • Voice control via local LLM without cloud wake words
  • Predictive health alerts by correlating device data patterns
  • Energy optimization by scheduling compute on cheapest power hours
  • Device-to-device ML model training distribution

Market Research

Similar to: Home Assistant, Hubitat, Apple HomeKit, Solid Project

Different because: First to treat IoT devices as MCP servers with local GPU-accelerated AI

Target users: Privacy-conscious tech enthusiasts with smart homes and homelab setups

Open Questions

  • Can we create a universal MCP wrapper for non-MCP IoT devices?
  • What's the minimum compute spec for running useful local LLMs?
  • How to handle device firmware that locks down data access?
  • Security model for allowing apps to subscribe to device streams?
  • Energy consumption tradeoffs of always-on local LLM?

Resources & Inspiration

Discussion